On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:40:35PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <[email protected]> you wrote: > > Not necessarily. Any sane implementation should just use wchar_t > Which could be UTF16 and therefore still has complicatd length semantics.
No, wchar_t is UCS-4 (or UCS-2 in esoteric implementations like Windows). Bastian -- Phasers locked on target, Captain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
