Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:00:40 +0200
> Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org> napsal(a):
>
>> To put it simply:
>> * Most packages using cdbs should be safe.
>> * Some packages using dh (most of those building only one binary
>> package) should be safe.
>> * All the rest needs updating, at least for the new setup.py
>> option.
>
> Well for most packages it just means merging back Ubuntu changes ...
> just if maintainer would be notified about them, it would make it much
> easier.
Unfortunately the transition was messed up in Ubuntu at too many places.
Including disabling unit tests to make the package "build" with Python 2.6. You
need to make sure that the Ubuntu patches really do what you expect them to do.
In a lot of cases it may be easier to migrate to dh :)
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
