On 09/09/09 at 16:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:04:16PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Choosing CC BY-SA would nicely conflict with our existing documentation, > > like the Debian new maintainer guide (GPL2+) or developers-reference > > (GPL2+). Wouldn't it be possible to use CC BY-SA with an additional > > clause allowing to switch to GPL2+? > > > > The french CeCILL license has such a clause (see 5.3.4 in > > http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_CeCILL_V2-en.txt). > > Why are we discussing this, given that from early feedback it was more > or less clear that we do not want to go the wiki way for devref?
That would apply to moving content from the wiki to dev-ref. If the wiki is CC BY-SA, and dev-ref is GPL2+, we have a problem. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
