Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 18:25 +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit : 
> That is the thread at large. Currently it was about why nnn-quiet is no
> suitable workaround if the followup address for users (nnn@) would suddenly
> also mail users.

Then use nnn-maintonly@, which will reach the PTS and mailing lists. Or
let’s create another alias to handle such exceptions. Whatever, as long
as the default behavior is made sane.

-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'   “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
  `-     future understand things”  -- Jörg Schilling

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Reply via email to