-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi,
Am Sa den 14. Nov 2009 um 15:45 schrieb Josselin Mouette: > it???s been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty > processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesn???t correspond anymore to > the way we use our machines. Yes. I think so. > To make things worse, the latest GDM upstream version doesn???t include a > tty manager anymore. Each started X server will simply use the first > available VT. That will be a bug in my eyes. One of the first thing I do on a new installed debian host is to disable getty on tty1 as I will always have the last log messages on that tty and no way to wipe it while logging in. The other ttys (2-6) are changed to use mingetty and I am happy quite often to have it at all as I refuse logging in as root with X. (And I think everybody logging in into X as root should get punishment at all. I know that the RedHat people do so but I am not RedHat and we aren't ;-) However, please do not refer so often to RedHat, that is just an other distribution. The last shitty thing I remember percolating to debian was that .localdomain problem which was completely unrelated to the problem but made many problems. Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.de/ pub 2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <kl...@ethgen.de> Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEUAwUBSwEp2Z+OKpjRpO3lAQoVkgf3frjvO2XCqNMHOk55vG0Vp8DLEnRC6oIC Sr90EHCd5sRkn3yFWw4CCoKj8exPFjFQcftI0spbxLtFeDkCSBTE+idy372Ab09E rcsZMUGC/xCdCuqvoOmYjkVFD0FiK9Y0fNx78ZiKCKSiBIUv2KaaL2Xh7lCqimz4 oZ0TVA5Ew/ijn1RF8GkO7PLx1h1wg/zz4Yy9DSw2+uRYO/4GulDf3XH/x8+Y6z4r xqwvFFyNZKllrQPuwAP3h2mSl5bEuagQvxrfD60UmO4UptUNuAAQc4paGH0EpwA4 9RkO2AaHLjvv53DvFb8tCENVsMuNixYG0iJGNgSO3vCZAUHSLXqs =be0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org