Brian May, le Sun 03 Jan 2010 16:48:06 +1100, a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Brian May <b...@snoopy.debian.net> wrote: > > > > > 1) I believe Xen, with paravirtualization (that is without QEMU) is more > > > secure > > > then KVM (or Xen) with QEMU. > > > > I haven't heard this claim before, do you have any references to support > > this? > > http://blog.orebokech.com/2007/05/xen-security-or-lack-thereof.html links to > http://taviso.decsystem.org/virtsec.pdf.
BTW, nowadays Xen is able to start qemu in stubdomains to sandbox it. That is however not yet packaged in Debian. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
