Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34 Hello
I would like to ask 2 question as user regarding your proposal. -- <snip> -- > Binary package name > =================== > > The Mozilla extension packaging team decided to use xul-ext- (instead of > mozilla-, iceweasel-, etc.) as prefix for all Mozilla extensions [1]. > This will group the extensions visually. There are currently 18 > extensions that use this naming scheme already. Please rename the binary > package if not already done. -- <snip> -- > Joining our team > ================ > > You are welcome to join our team. We maintain all packages in git in the > pkg-mozext group. You can contact us via email or IRC [3]. Please let us > know, if you need help implementing the above mentioned items. Question 1: You propose to use the prefix "xul-ext-" which is more generic i guess but the itself is called "pkg-mozext". Is that "moz" in the team name for historic reasons? Or is it planed to rename it "pkg-xul-ext" Team? It just sounds strange because these two are contradictory to your proposal. > Work needing package > ==================== > > Here is a list of source package that need to updated. Please let me > know, if I missed some packages. > > beagle > biofox > ctxextensions > diggler > firegpg > foxyproxy > icedove-attachmentreminder > icedove-gcontactsync > icedove-quotecolors 2nd question: In the good old days (when ever these were) someone like a short sighted person like me could search via apt or aptitude for *compatible* extentions to his application. Now does it mean, that all those xulrunner based apps can make use the same extensions? e.g. does ist make sens to use "xul-ext-quotecolors" with iceweasle? Realy i don't get so please explain a bit more deeply. regards -- bye Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
