Adam D. Barratt, le Thu 01 Apr 2010 09:57:12 +0200, a écrit : > * GNU/kFreeBSD-* > The release of these two new architectures looks promising, but they > are still far away from full archive coverage. It seems that much > could be gained by fixing some key packages.
What is the target BTW? Just remind a remark I made some time ago (august 2008): “in the Failed part of hurd-i386, 178 packages out of 1320 fail at least because of inclusion of #include <linux/...> (there could be other [packages of this type] hidden by other compilation problems). That's 2.29% of the 7748 packages in our wanna-build database!... And we still have 1952 packages in the dep-wait state, a lot of them probably include <linux/...> too...” Some updated figures: now this is 220 packages out of 1404 failed, out of total 8560, which thus makes 2.33%. On top of that, 31 (0.31%) can be added that use <asm/types.h>. So in a word it could be estimated that at least 5% of the packages do some #include <linux/...> already. Of course there are a lot more other kinds of issues. That's why I'm afraid just fixing some key packages won't be enough, all maintainers should get involved. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100401101751.gf4...@const.bordeaux.inria.fr