On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:01:31AM -0400, James Vega wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:47:28PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:18:30AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > > That being said, I would (as it is now) actually prefer that it was > > > > just a helper tool that from a VCS could derive a source package of > > > > existing format. That would probably also increase the adoption rate, > > > > since existing tools would work with those formats. > > > > > > The (theoretical) format that I gave as example was precisely this: it > > > generates a "3.0 (quilt)" source package using a VCS repository as input. > > > > I guess what we should have is additional line in it or additional file > > to record vcs used for packaging which will not interface with the basic > > operation of other tools. > > You mean Vcs-* in debian/control?
I thought Raphael's idea on the (theoretical) format was a bit more than recording VCS repository site but how VCS is used as imput to the packaging. In any case, I am for not-adding too-much-complication if we can live without them. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100401163822.gb11...@osamu.debian.net
