Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> My understanding is that part (although certainly not all) of the reason
> behind the default change is consistency with the kfreebsd architectures
> which are expected to be part of Debian. Debian has needed to adapt to
> BSD behavior, non-standard or not, since the project decided to include
> the kfreebsd architectures. That's part of porting.
What is wrong with porting kfreebsd behaivour instead?
--
John H. Robinson, IV jaq...@debian.org
http ((((
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[
as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html ((((
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100413181449.ga19...@a.mx.sbih.org
