On Fri, May 14 2010, Scott James Remnant wrote: >> One of my concerns about upstart is that systems that want to >> use SELinux and upstart _have_ to also use an initramfs, which is yet >> another component of the system that has to be audited. There have >> been patches proposed, and semi-rejected b the upstart folks, who are >> of the opinions that only systems using initramfs need apply. >> > Have to jump in here, but this is simply not true. > > I have never rejected any SELinux patches for Upstart; I have simply > never been *sent* any.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543420#10 > I've always said I'm quite happy to sit down with the SELinux folks and > work out the right way to do this. We can start with: http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/07/24/se-linux-policy-loading/ manoj -- The first is to ensure your partner understands that nature has root privileges - nature doesn't have to make sense. -- Telsa Gwynne Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20 05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wrv4zxiz....@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com
