Stephen Leake wrote:
Currently, a package is upgraded only if its name does not change.
Good point.
Is the hack then to introduce a new "lib<name><old-ali>-dev"
package which is empty but depends on
"lib<name><new-ali>-dev"?
Lots of empty packages, just to get the upgrade to work, but
if we have a plan for avoiding this in the future, then I
think it is an acceptable (but far from perfect) solution to
the immediate problem.
Greetings,
Jacob
--
"Good enough for physics" -- Ridcully
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1005281432250.3...@hugsarin.sparre-andersen.dk
