On: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 17:44:05 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote: > "Joachim Wiedorn" <ad_deb...@joonet.de> wrote: >> I see that more people than thought still want to have or need LiLO. >> Now I have decided to start and reanimate the upstream development. >> Everyone is invited to join in this development. I'm working on LiLO >> version 23. Shortly with more informations ... > > Have fun. When you have a release that actually has merit, it can be > reconsidered for inclusion in Debian.
What is your definition of "merit", William? And why does the current release not have it? > > In the meantime, the original plan continues. The original plan was based on false assumptions. Why would you continue with a plan based on false assumptions? We now have a release of lilo with (a) an active upstream maintainer, and (b) no release critical bugs. If you simply don't want to be a Debian package maintainer for lilo anymore, why not ask for volunteers to take over for you? -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1545549194.342558.1275871054568.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
