On 2010-06-29, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:24:00AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> No, my proposal is to move the package to a better home: backports. > Same question as for Md with volatile: > apt-cache rdepends xulrunner-1.9.1 libmozjs2d libwebkit-1.0-2 > What do you do with these packages ? backports too ? Do you realize some > of these are part of the core of the GNOME desktop ?
Actually we have the same problem with clamav in volatile. We would need to put all rdeps there, otherwise stuff gets messy. At least that's a very restricted set, yours is... not feasible, I suppose. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrni2k6lv.vri.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
