Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:54:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> while I managed to trigger autobuilding on all architectures for one package
>> (velvet) in February, the same approach applied to another another one
>> (emboss)
>> gives problems: the architecture-dependant packages are built, but they are
>> not
>> transferred to the archive. In both cases I think I did the same:
>>
>> - Remove mention of the local build architecture in the Binary field.
>> - Remove mention of the architecture-dependant packages in the Description
>> and
>> Checksums fields.
>> - Upload only the architecture-independant packages using the hand-edited
>> Debian
>> source control file.
>>
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20100220T041711Z.html
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/emboss/news/20100723T023358Z.html
>>
>> Was there a change in the meantime that makes the trick impossible ?
>>
> No, you just need to fix your changes file name to not clash with the
> buildd.
>
> 20100723023339|process-upload|dak|Processing changes
> file|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes
> 20100723023358|process-upload|dak|installing
> changes|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes
>
> I assume the above is your upload.
>
> 20100723091703|process-upload|dak|Processing changes
> file|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes
> 20100723091705|process-upload|dak|rejected|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes
>
> And this is the buildd trying to upload a file with the same name.
>
> See also /srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/reject/emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.reason
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
Maybe there should be a tool (small wrapper script) to edit the changes
file the right way. There are probably more people that would like to do
this and a lot more people that would like to see it being used.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sk33wv0v....@frosties.localdomain
