Carl Fürstenberg writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name"):
> Policy only states "The maintainers should report this to the
> debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which
> program will have to be renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached,
> both programs must be renamed."; I don't see any consensus in the
> thread you linked to, so technically both must change at the moment :)I wrote that bit of the policy and my intent was to try to punish people for picking stupid names. Yes, both binaries should be renamed. "node" is a ridiculous name for a specific-purpose executable. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/19608.43395.371240.670...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
