Hi!
One conclusion from earlier discussions about the Julius license on
debian-legal was that it was non-free:
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-le...@lists.debian.org/msg40898.html
The thread isn't completely clear to me what the exact problem is
though...
As far as I can work out the ambiguous advertising clause is the problem
(as well as possibly clause 5 but that seems to be open for discussion).
I agree that this clause is quite badly worded and already asked about
it in the Julius forums (I am "bedahr"):
http://julius.sourceforge.jp/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=644-
But I never got a reply.
Is Julius dynamically linked to Simon? I wonder whether GPLv2 is
compatible with the Julius license.
Yes it is. The simon license contains a special exception to allow this.
This is also covered here:
http://www.simon-listens.org/wiki/index.php/Licensing
Regards,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c98b8b3.6080...@simon-listens.org
