>> From what concerns the BTS, Don's proposal in [2] (the main one, not
>> the alternative solution) seems reasonable to me and others in the
>> thread. The proposal also seems to assume a different Maintainer
>> field for the bpo package, as hinted above, am I wrong Don?
> Right. The idea here is that there will be an additional recipient for
> bugs which affect the version present in bpo; in the case where the
> bug is bpo only, headers in the message will allow maintainers to
> filter out these bugs in mail and the bug listings. [Possibly even by
> default, but the opt-in mechanism is harder than the default-in to
> implement.]
Stepping in sideways here, but in case you can make use of them,
backports is creating the same debversion info like the main
archive. Want them synced to the bts?
--
bye, Joerg
(13:24) <Aquariophile> ist iptables eigentlich nur ein tool zum
verhindern von aussenkonnectierungen auf gewissen ports oder ist
iptables eine firewall?
(13:27) <maxx> ist ein packet filter
(13:27) <Aquariophile> maxx: also der verhindert pings?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r5glsz9u....@gkar.ganneff.de
