On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 00:18:44 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:55:32PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > What about building this architecture:all package only in binary-indep? > > Like in the attached patch... This way, the buildds won't try to build them. > > > diff -u wordnet-3.0/debian/rules wordnet-3.0/debian/rules > > -build/goldendict-wordnet:: goldendict-wordnet.dsl.dz > > goldendict-wordnet_abrv.dsl > > +install/goldendict-wordnet:: goldendict-wordnet.dsl.dz > > goldendict-wordnet_abrv.dsl > > Uhm, but shouldn't that massive multi-hour _building_ of data be in a > "build" (specifically, "build-indep") target rather than "install"? > Not if you don't want it to happen on buildds.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
