In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: : This list can be added to by anyone. What I'd like to ask for now is any : comments on this.
A checklist like this is a good idea, particularly if it eventually provides the list of things that initially need to be part of a regression suite for the package. The downer is that if you don't get working on a regression suite for each package, testing a couple thousand packages against non-null checklists seems like it could take a wickedly long time... particularly if, as I suspect, many packages need to get revisioned during the testing interval to fix bugs. Bdale -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
