On 12/12/2010 20:27, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote:
>> On la, 2010-12-11 at 17:04 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> I agree it's not optimal, hence my push for auto linking.
>>
>> Can you provide a link to a page giving a description of this
>> auto-linking stuff?
>
> See "lib" at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7f0aews7(v=vs.80).aspx
This shows one pragma syntax.
But I would like to see a more important discussion about the problem
that is tried to be solved and the advantage/disadvantage against other
classical tools (lib-config script and pkg-config files for example).
In particular, how this would work with multi-arch ?
I did not analyzed in details this proposition (auto-linking) but,
for now, I'm not at all confident that this would be a good move.
Regards,
Vincent
> Note: gcc doesn't support it (yet).
>
> Olaf
>
>
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d06a144.8040...@free.fr
