On 12/26/2010 02:10 PM, Malte Forkel wrote: > Am 25.12.2010 20:18, schrieb Michael Banck: >> >> Why can't this be part of pbuilder itself? Did your patches got >> rejected by the pbuilder author and if so, what was his rationale? >> Maybe if he thinks they should not be part of pbuilder, they shouldn't >> be part of another package either. >> > > I haven't attempted to submit my code yet. It works for me, but still > has to be cleaned up. Right now, I'm packaging it as a way of > documenting and organizing what I've done. > > But, aside from the pbuilder specifics: Is there any policy, best > practice, or LSB scheme for extending an existing package? Are there any > hooks to re-apply changes to an existing package after it has been updated?
There is no such thing, though things that come close are: alternatives, hooks or config directories. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d175b42.7080...@debian.org