On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh >> Maybe I wasn't clear, in that case I'm sorry. To me, O_ATOMIC is > Whether this should map to O_ATOMIC in glibc or be something new, I don't > care. But if it is a flag, I'd highly suggest naming it O_CREATEUNLINKED or > something else that won't give people wrong ideas, as _nothing_ but the > final inode linking is atomic.
How does this solve the meta-data issue? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=vvjs5yh84dfq-oeumym7btjng+yu0pkk-r...@mail.gmail.com
