Olaf van der Spek, le Tue 04 Jan 2011 18:46:47 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > > Steve Langasek, le Tue 04 Jan 2011 09:34:45 -0800, a écrit : > >> I don't agree. dpkg doesn't need to care that /usr/lib/libm.so really > >> unpacks to /lib/libm.so due to /usr -> / symlink, > > > > dpkg doesn't care, but shlibdeps does care, hurd-i386 has been bitten by > > that enough to make us give up with /usr -> /. > > Why couldn't shlibdeps be fixed?
We kept fixing it, and at some point (where it became really not obvious to fix it, or would have made it very cpu-consuming to solve the path ambiguities), we got tired. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110104181332.gg5...@const.bordeaux.inria.fr
