On 2011-01-07, Adnan Hodzic <ad...@foolcontrol.org> wrote: >> And yes, this mail is mocking this whole story. And no, you shouldn't >> go whining about your pet package on -devel to get it included. > What I don't understand is your tone by which you're conveying this message. > > If it wasn't for those "pet packages" as you call them, Debian > wouldn't be what it is today, and there wouldn't be number of packages > you listed below.
So we should push the "removals from testing / additions to testing" mails to -devel instead of -testing-changes? Now that we're in freeze? I didn't understand the tone of the initial mail to -devel neither, given that the bug was still open and thus sort of unhandled by us. And next somebody will say "CUT would have googleearth-package". That'd be fun. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrniiel65.hm1.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de