On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:58:26PM +0000, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-01-07, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
[...]
> > This means that firmware-linux-nonfree is unlikely to be installed if not
> > needed. If you were to add in some of the other firmware packages
> > (-atheros, -bnx2, -iwlwifi, -ralink, -realtek) you would see an even
> > larger fraction. This is unfortunate but not hugely surprising to me.
>
> Popcon as linked from the PTS helpful lists all the binary packages.
>
> Does it get pulled in if non-free is activated during installation? I.e. is
> there something scanning the hardware again looking at what's needed
> post-install? (Assuming that you get around installing it without those.)
I think the plan was that any firmware package that is available during
installation and that satisfies a firmware request will get installed.
However, I have not worked on this and I don't know what has actually
been implemented.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110107182902.gp3...@decadent.org.uk
