Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 13:34 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > I’d favor that one too. The sooner we can adapt reverse dependencies to > > 4.0 in experimental, the better. And no need to do the work twice. > > There have been almost a year to adapt reverse dependencies to 3.6 in > experimental. And I don't think most rdeps are ready for 3.6. Do you > expect things to be significantly different?
Yes. We’re no longer in a freeze but at the beginning of a development cycle. Note that we’re mostly doing the same for GNOME; skipping most of 2.32 in unstable, to work on 2.91 in experimental. -- .''`. : :' : “You would need to ask a lawyer if you don't know `. `' that a handshake of course makes a valid contract.” `- -- J???rg Schilling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298034464.18394.72.camel@meh