On Wednesday, March 02, 2011 04:53:46 am Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/03/11 04:24, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > It seems to me not worth a mass bug filing. This doesn't seem like > > something that would affect user's systems. Is there a rationale for > > imposing this ordering other than puiparts can't deal with it? > > If you have non-free enabled and install a package from main, it should > install the dependencies from main. So you should have e.g. "rar | > rar-nonfree" instead of the other way round.
Why? If the user has made the choice to use non-free and the maintainer concludes that's a more technically capable solution for users that choose to use it, why should the project raise barriers to that choice? Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103020941.02177.deb...@kitterman.com