On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: >> Or is it actually so that the libc should map uses of epoll_create1 to >> epoll_create? Or do we need to introduce run-time checks as to whether >> epoll_create1 is available? > > There's no way around run-time checks if you want to be safe from this race, > yeah. It can be done either in libc or in your code; the former means less > code duplication but hurts badly any backporting.
Why is the function declared but not implemented? Seems kinda silly. Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi,xNzNvk1M=wkawxjtzfs5m3dzrfnyu4vh...@mail.gmail.com
