Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Personally, I still think that reply-to is a bad solution;
I agree. > The people with sad mail software and lazy fingers are > penalizing the people with low bandwidth. Don't break conforming > software to cater to broken software. Are we sure that we giving the right answers to Gonzalo's problem? I received his post about "Re: linux/unix to NT" twice (only his): one had the headers: Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by templinux.bucknell.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA07482; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 21:19:26 -0500 Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 21:19:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Message-ID: <"y-M46C.A.OzB.lGMh0"@templinux> X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/513 while the other: Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by newton.nowhere.cl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA01886; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300 Resent-Date: 3 Dec 1997 02:12:33 -0000 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 18:13:06 -0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Message-ID: <"V_NgkD.A.M7B.RAMh0"@debian> X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/11843 That messages took two different paths and were distributed by two different servers (is templinux.bucknell.edu our list backup or is a NNTP/SMTP gateway ? ) Has Gonzalo a newsfeed serving debian-devel? fabrizio -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic | 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E > Just because Red Hat do it doesn't mean it's a good idea. [Ian J.] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .