James Troup wrote: > The packaging manual is wrong; this is a long standing bug.
Can you explain, or refer to a bug number that explains it? It's not very good to have incorrect instructions for shared libraries at a time when we're doing a massive shared-library upgrade. > > Why is it calling ldconfig? > > Because it's the Right thing to do. Heh. That argument only convinces me if I already know why it's Right :-) What does the ldconfig do, if the symlinks are already there? Richard Braakman -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
