On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote:
> Seeing how many mirrors are affected, either the apt change should be > reverted or the list of mirrors should be updated to pinpoint those that > are known to work correctly ; or both. What about this: apt downloads both Release/Release.gpg and InRelease. If InRelease is old then it should use Release/Release.gpg and warn the user that their mirror is buggy and that they should contact the mirror operator. Then on the Debian website we should have a way for users to find out how to contact their mirror operator. What was the reason for adding InRelease anyway? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinfjgxr11nwugoqocuhrjn-kj+pmuvfwum7g...@mail.gmail.com
