On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 14:33:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 22.03.2011 14:20, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On 2011-03-22, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > >>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional > > ^^^^^^ > >>> control field: Built-Using. > > [...] > >> that would be too strict for e.g. gcj-4.5 > >> Built-Using: gcc-4.5 (>= 4.5.2-1~), gcc-4.5 (<< 4.5.3) > >> would be correct, however this already can be expressed in the build > >> dependencies, so I assume packages like gcj-4.x, gdc-4.x, gnat-4.x don't > >> need to > >> be changed. > > > > They'd need to *generate* them in the *binary* packages. So you "just" > > declare > > the one that was installed at the time of building and you're set. > > no, they are not needed at all for these packages. > If that's not needed for those packages then why bring them up?
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110322140709.ga3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
