On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:00:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:52:33AM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > On 08:18 Mon 04 Apr     , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > RH> Hi,
> 
> > RH> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> > >> Stupid scheme (intended for stupid users) should be based on ifupdown
> > >> but shouldn't replace it.
> 
> > RH> Please refrain from calling people "stupid users" just because they use 
> > a
> > RH> software that you don't like.
> 
> > There was a way "User can do anything", the way was replaced by the way
> > "User can do something in list". Obviously that this action has been
> > done for stupid users.
> 
> Yes, a user can do anything with ifconfig if his time has no value.  I am
> happily using network manager on my laptop, because unlike ifconfig it's
> easy to configure for use on new wireless networks.
> 
> I am not happy that network manager bypasses ifconfig to do this;
[...]

I am.  NM uses the correct interface, i.e. netlink.  ifconfig is a
BSD legacy.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
                                                              - Albert Camus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404103130.gf2...@decadent.org.uk

Reply via email to