On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:09:42PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > ]] Stanislav Maslovski > > > > | AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation > > | process is that its suport of wireless networks is very limited: only > > | WEP is supported, and there are problems with lost connections. I am > > | pretty sure that these problems may be addressed without replacing all > > | the infrastructure and switching to NM, though. > > > > d-i doesn't use ifupdown, it uses netcfg. > > Hm, okay, I was pretty sure J.M. at some point mentioned replacing > ifupdown _in the installer_ with network manager… Then, the current > limitations of the installer are not even related to ifupdown at all. > That is a good news.
Yes, he did. Here: "On my personal wishlist for wheezy is d-i actually calling NM behind the scenes to configure the network, instead of ifupdown. I'll definitely try to find time to hack on this. -- .''. Josselin Mouette" -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110405082156.GA7988@kaiba.homelan