On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:24 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:14:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> (04/04/2011): > > > The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important > > > is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when > > > it's used in a package. Which means quite some packages will need to > > > be changed. > > > What is the most obvious reason to degrade bash to Priority: important? > > > (I can understand shell maintainers would like to get bash out of > > their way, but how many (other) people really want to get rid of it?) > > Anybody doing development for embedded systems. :) > Which of those people don't also want to get rid of dash and coreutils and use busybox instead?
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110405170908.gx3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr