Hello Jon Dowland, Am 2011-04-11 12:02:09, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > And you wouldn't be - because, once again - you are not forced to use whatever > the default solution is, you have the freedom to switch to another, just like > people who currently *do* use network-manager have taken advantage of.
WILL be there a choice to install ifupdownd instead of NM? And what about automated instalations? I think, DI has to support a Fast-Install-Option for Desktop and Server where the first one installs NM by default and the second one IFUPDOWND. > We are really going around and around with the same set of misconceptions and > misunderstandings. Please carefully read the thread again before re-iterating > any more mistakes! This thread is talking about "network-manager as default" which is definitively no go. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack -- ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability) Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 (homeoffice) 50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17 67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix <http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/> <http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/> Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de ICQ #328449886 Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature