* Philip Hands <p...@hands.com> [110413 12:54]: > This strikes me as suboptimal, since one could use the disk space > allocated to /tmp as extra swap and then allocate a tmpfs of that size > to be mounted on /tmp with no effect other than allowing the system to > have access to more swap than it would have otherwise had (of course, > that's probably more than it needs, so instead you could just save some > disk space that would otherwise be left generally unused by overloading > the swap usage with /tmp usage. > > Therefore, in the multi-partition setup, I think we should also default > to having /tmp on tmpfs.
This has both the disadvantage of a system then having swap (given the big memory sizes one currently has and the big difference between RAM and disk access times, having swap is often quite a disadvantage) and of mixing several different things (/tmp is usually something simply filling over time, so without low enough limits one risks that something important is sometime not working because of missing RAM). Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110413113412.ga3...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de