On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 19:13:43 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2011-04-06 codeh...@debian.org wrote: > > Package: ggz-grubby > > Severity: normal > > User: codeh...@debian.org > > Usertags: la-file-removal > > > To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy > > 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs > > against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed > > or stripped of the dependency_libs variable. > [...] > > Hello, > > Please stop this mass bug filing. > a) There were duplicate bugs filed. > b) Bugs were filed for issues recently solved. > c) The bugs reports are unversioned. > > I can completely understand that a and b can occassionally happen due > to timing issues. However imnsho a MBF with unversioned bug-reports is > not acceptable. > Ack. Also I think this should simply be a lintian check, there's no need to have a mass bug filing about it.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110423104510.gg2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr