On 09/05/2011 11:53, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> On 08/05/2011 17:33, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> Note: proxy NDP is required when your provider gives you a flat /64
>> (ie its router is in your /64, generally prefix::1 and it tries to talk
>> directly to any host of your /64 network)
>> and you want to have subnetworks (one for wifi, one for your DMZ, ...)
>
> We've been trying to avoid that kind of bad practice here in Brazil,
> through an effort to get ISPs to undertand you do NOT issue /64 to
> clients in the various NANOG-like (locally called "GTER") encounters
> throughout the year.
>
> It is an uphill battle. Time for an informational RFC, perhaps? It
> does help to point people at a RFC, where all technical arguments are
> fully written down and explained.
Given the fact that the provider is the French ISP Free/Proxad (the
one that invent the 6rd technique), I really doubt that this is not
a deliberate choice on their part. But if anything can convince them
to modify their practice, it would be a very good thing.
Regards,
Vincent
PS: no need to CC me
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc7cee8.5080...@free.fr
