Hi Steve, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:47:25AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > debian/copyright should list the names of the actual copyright holders of > the work. debian-devel is not a great resource for helping you figure out > who those copyright holders are, but if the upstream author has already told > you who the copyright holder is, you should list that. > I'm agree with you.
> You mention that the upstream author *transformed* the image. Mechanical > transformations (such as compilation of source code) do not normally have > copyright associated with them, so the copyright of cat.pzl would probably > be the same as for cat.jpg. > yes, would probably... but I think *transformed* image holder is upstream author so copyright belong to him or I'm wrong... Compilation as a process result from sources present in that case I'm agree with you. > > Add: > > - Previous Debian release include copyright image owner. > > - Image license requires link to web site source as a condition. > > This last part sounds potentially non-free. If this is software that you're > planning to include in Debian main, please submit the license to > debian-le...@lists.debian.org for public review of its terms. I'll take your advice and I'll ask a question in debian-legal. Thanks a lot. Best regards, -- Elías Alejandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110722164220.GA2271@debianero
