* Lars Wirzenius (l...@liw.fi) [110815 23:27]: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:04:51PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > > * Lars Wirzenius [2011-08-15 18:33 +0100]: > > > raw gz xz > > > 584 163 134 file sizes (MiB) > > > 0 421 450 savings compared to raw (MiB) > > > -421 0 29 savings compared to current gz (MiB)
> In other words, it's 130 MiB against xz's 134 MiB. I'll leave it to > others to decide if it's a significatn difference. bzip2 is definitly a more conservative choice than xz. If it's smaller, than it's superior to xz. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110815215907.gd15...@mails.so.argh.org
