On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:36:46PM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends > > Build-Recommends is a bad name for this for two reasons: [...] > > So Build-Core-Depends would certainly be a better approach, but I wonder why > this isn't being called Build-Depends-Stage1 or similar?
What about "Build-Minimal"? Shorter. -- 1KB // Yo momma uses IPv4!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
