On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:56:53PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > We should do it when we judge that the benefits are worth the costs. > In this particular case the costs seem to be minimal. There isn't > even a direct patch-carrying cost, since the dependency is expressed > in our own control files.
What should it be called: gnome-without-network-manager? I really don't like evolution. Can I have a gnome-without-evolution? (Only half-joking. I *really* don't like evolution). Where do you draw the line? (Of course, any Debian developer can freely create such a dependency package, it doesn't have to be the GNOME maintainers.) In case it isn't clear, I don't think it's a good idea. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111101154635.GA12473@pris
