On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Stephen Kitt <st...@sk2.org> wrote: > I've thought > about splitting the packages up, with separate 32- and 64-bit targets, but > I'm not sure whether replacing and providing the mingw32 packages would be > correct, since mingw-w64 isn't a drop-in replacement (the triplets are > different). If that's not a problem then why not! The names for the 32-bit > packages would probably be quite weird though since the upstream name is > mingw-w64 (and I'd rather keep that in the package names...).
mingw-w64-i386 and mingw-w64-x64 are a bit ugly but still look sensible -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cakcbokvd1_r62r00tshpnbo4reakksqwq2zz61mb-umlhf5...@mail.gmail.com
