I demand that Stephan Seitz may or may not have written... > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:34:34AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> Actually, Red Hat's goal *is* to support a separate /usr, they just want >> to have the initramfs mount it.
> But as was seen in the last discussion, not everyone *has* an initramfs, > because it is not needed in many cases or sometimes even not supported on > the platform. On any box for which I've built a kernel, there's no initramfs and (except in one case – netbook) there's a separate /usr. I'd quite like to keep it this way... / (without /usr) is often enough for rescue purposes (and if it isn't, it's enough to get /usr mounted). And if / is broken, then you have larger problems anyway. This mount-/usr/-in-initramfs looks to me like a means of reducing choice. -- | _ | Darren Salt, using Debian GNU/Linux (and Android) | ( ) | | X | ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail | / \ | http://www.asciiribbon.org/ Take my advice, I'm not using it right now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52455ef1f4%li...@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk