On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:07:08PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > just because that you didn't get any reports you should not set a status > to ACCEPTED. IMHO the driver of a DEP should not do that at all, at > least not without asking on common lists first. No reaction on your DEP > could just mean that people consider it as a waste of time or don't like > your format.
Who should have that authority, then? The DEP-0 proposers? Since the whole DEP process itself is still in CANDIDATE, we could end up in an interesting situation if/when it comes to migrate *that* to ACCEPTED ☺ DEP-0 merely says > consensus exists that the implementation has been a success Perhaps that needs unpacking. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120116144947.GB9047@pris
