Bastian Blank, le Fri 17 Feb 2012 20:36:33 +0100, a écrit : > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:07:40PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Bastian Blank, le Fri 17 Feb 2012 19:02:59 +0100, a écrit : > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:59:51PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Bastian Blank, le Fri 17 Feb 2012 18:52:10 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > I see this: > > > > > | Provides: libasound2-dev, liboss-salsa-dev > > > > These, that's expected. > > > No, this is not expected. libasound2-dev is a real package. > > On Linux. > > Irrelevant. If I depend on X and it is real, I want X.
Except that here X doesn't exist on non-linux ports. > > > > > So liboss4-salsa-dev is seriously broken. > > > > How so? > > > It breaks unrelated packages. > > Not on !linux. > > Obviously it does. So stop it. What is obvious? liboss-libsalsa-dev hasn't posed any problem since 2009. liboss4-salsa-dev does because it was also introduced on Linux port. That is a problem, indeed, but I still don't see what it breaks on non-linux ports. If it didn't exist, packages depending on libasound2-dev would even just *not* be compiled at all. So it does not make the situation worse. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120217234136.ga4...@type.famille.thibault.fr
