Le lundi 27 février 2012 à 05:19 +0100, Sebastian Heinlein a écrit : > Am Donnerstag, den 23.02.2012, 18:46 +0200 schrieb Timo Juhani > Lindfors: > > Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org> writes: > > > (We even have a patch to allow only a subset of packages but it is > > > unfortunately a bit too hackish.) > > > > Would be really nice to have some standard sets available (think > > "browser extensions", "command-line tools that ship no services or suid > > binaries"). I'd certainly let my desktop users install these without > > having to ask me or having to install them manually to their $HOME.. > > Do you need a whitelist or a blacklist?
This should clearly be a whitelist. I don’t think there’s real use for a blacklist, it is too dangerous. > Do you want to limit all installations via aptdaemon or only for a set > of users? This functionality is already available through the PolicyKit configuration. Maybe you can add two levels of authorization, one for installing any package, the other one for installing the subset. > We could limit the allowed packages by e.g. debtags, section and package > names. Yes please! And I can has limitations by repository and priority too? Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330331524.3297.1748.camel@pi0307572