Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:57:03PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> It's a little tricky because hardening-check is prone to false >> positives (through no fault of its own; it's just a limitation of what >> one can check). > Didn't lintian split severity/certainty levels for use cases like this > one? Yeah, but I'm still reluctant to introduce tags that we *know* will generate false positives. But in this case it's probably important enough to warrant it. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
